Re: Re: Conn 56K vs King 2341


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by wondering on August 14, 2001 at 13:34:18:

In Reply to: Re: Conn 56K vs King 2341 posted by Richard Murrow on August 14, 2001 at 10:54:00:

Is the 4th valve bigger (and the 5th too, I suppose) on the 52/56J in order to have enough conical tubing ( as compared to the 2341, that is)? The BBb being 2 feet longer than the CC will have that 2 feet in conical (not cylindrical) tubing, yes? So when the CC activates the 5th valve to become (pretty much) a BBb, it needs that tubing to be conical? Is that why the 2341 doen't need the big 4th valve? Does any of this make sense?

P.S. the 2341 in satin silver is just gorgeous....


Follow Ups: