Posted by js on December 11, 2001 at 17:18:28:
In Reply to: CONN 56J posted by ETMS on December 11, 2001 at 12:38:35:
I would consider the Conn to be a very close second (debatably equal-but-different) to the "regular" MW2155, but the "2000" is head and shoulders above the "regular" 2155 and the Conn.
I would predict that you will be much happier if you base your opinions/decisions on your own observations, though, instead of others'.