Yamaha F822 and conical bore: a complain


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Volpe on February 17, 2000 at 07:15:39:

The F822 is realy a good horn but I do not understand 2 thing:

-)Why Yamaha did not use a conical bore?
-)Why the 5th valve is after the others?

The 621 is too small for me, but I think that it is fantastic for the size. I think that
the reason is also becose they used a conical bore and a 5th before!
My opinion is that the 822 should have a better bass (after the B flat).
What do you think?
Volpe


Follow Ups: