Posted by Once Again on January 24, 2001 at 13:31:33:
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Cerveny F tuba posted by sorry, wrong on January 24, 2001 at 13:14:20:
The picture of a 92J sure looks like a 653, but the specs say that it is the same height as a 651, 102CM. Assuming the picture is right, UMI must have used the wrong specs.