Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 4/4 -vs- 4/4 -vs- 4/4

Posted by Michael Russo on March 22, 2001 at 19:57:23:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: 4/4 -vs- 4/4 -vs- 4/4 posted by Gerald J. on March 22, 2001 at 19:49:46:

Thanks! I'll let the webmaster know. It's correct in the text he was given!

mike