Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Conversation (fight?) starter


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Doug on May 08, 2002 at 21:42:32:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Conversation (fight?) starter posted by A G in V. on May 08, 2002 at 16:04:13:

Sir in Virginia,

I get the impression that we are a lot alike, because, like you, I can't end a discussion until every little thing to be discussed is exhausted, or I fall asleep :-)

Webster's #4 definition is all well and good, but im sitting here looking at my two dictionaries, and one says 'dishonest" and the other says 'not straightforward' and it's those definitions that were meant. I have a lot to learn about life, but I'm smart enough to know that I would never baselessly accuse soemone of criminal activity. I understand the concept of libel and slander, and their consequences. I do, however, enjoy fun jabs at people who have treated me badly, and in this case, not straightforwardly as well as dishonestly, so my sentence can stand.

This is fun, should we continue here, or just email me?

Peace

Doug "i'm a pedant myself" G


Follow Ups: