Re: Re: Re: Re: is a 5th valve necessary?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Bryan A on December 01, 2003 at 15:10:40:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: is a 5th valve necessary? posted by Tony Clements on December 01, 2003 at 09:48:41:

Your original comment may have sounded a bit "flip", but I'm certain that many of us would have posted the same thing had you not been first. Reading it simply caused us (or me anyway) to react to YOUR comment, and think the whole question through from a different angle. This is exactly where good threads come from. Our sudents (or their parents) will ask the 4 VS 5 valve question, and this is exactly the kind of info we need to give them to help them make an informed decision.

Bryan "whos search of the Effie Suite turned up only 2 low F's" Altherr


Follow Ups: